Posts Tagged Customer Service

Figaro, Figaro, Figaro

A Saturday night at Opera Colorado’s performance of The Barber of Seville was helped along by an ingenious iPhone app.  Almost any event held at Denver’s Ellie Caulkins Opera House both benefits and suffers from the features of its seats, to wit, the incredibly uncomfortable seats (which could only have been selected because the folding chair manufacturer was out of stock)  along with the clever electronic seatback titling system called, appropriately, Figaro. Since few of Denver’s opera fans are either fluent in Italian (or French and German) or have an intimate knowledge of the sung libretto, the English translation provided by the pale blue OLED displays makes the performances much easier to follow. Such translation titling in America’s opera houses was once viewed as hayseed – a reflection of the lack of sophistication of US audiences – but has grown to be adopted by other country bumpkin facilities in Milan, Barcelona, London and Vienna.

Figaro Titling at the Ellie Caulkins Opera House

Suffice it to say that none of row D’s occupants had working Figaro’s to accompany Figaro, creating a less than optimal experience and quite a bit of griping to the helpless ushers during intermission. Having seen Barber staged, albeit close to 20 years earlier, I recalled that Act II has a large amount of sung character narrative that propels the action; in other words, it’s pretty hard to follow what’s going on without some type of libretto. So what to do? In the age of the iPhone could there be an app to bail the casual opera fan out? Indeed there is. A quick search of the App Store revealed that the good folks at Intermundia had an app that contained not only an English/Italian libretto, but an adjustable slider that would allow the text to move at a speed consistent with the performance – brilliant. So while the rest of my row scratched their heads through to the conclusion, I was more able to enjoy the chaos of Rossini’s comedy.

Opera App Saves the Evening

As to the performance? Opera Colorado’s production of one of music’s most beloved comedies turned out to be great fun. Director David Gately has staged this warhorse 30 times before utilizing a broadly comic reading that includes plenty of sight gags, cartoonish versions of the Bartolo and Basilio characters and a silly slow-motion brawl that ends Act I that would make fans of The Matrix proud. Rosina was beautifully sung by Isabel Leonard (remember that name as she may the next great young mezzo-soprano), her debut performance in the role. The opening night “talk back” session held by General Director Greg Carpenter and Director of Artistic Planning Brad Trexell was a welcome chance to gain insight into the production planning and thought process of the company.

A hearty Bravo to the cast – and to the inventiveness and ingenuity of the iPhone app.

, , ,

No Comments

Measuring ROI 10 Years On…

Robot Last Click

Robot Last Click

To say that there have been seismic changes over the past 10 years in the ways that we market online is to belabor the obvious. That said, let’s belabor anew as the “00’s” come to a merciful end and we head into 2010. Among the most significant have been the erosion of the walls that existed between the online or digital activities of marketers and those of the traditional or offline variety. In 2000 it wasn’t uncommon at all for a company or brand to have a distinctly separate dotcom marketing team (and even business unit) from the majority of its marketing activities. The notion of silo’d digital marketing has become one that businesses adhere to at their peril as the wisdom of integration and alignment of all marketing channels has grown to become the prevailing wind. In other words, your website had better be telling the same story as your retail locations, you catalogs, your customer service teams, sales teams, as well as PR and brand support. Customers have come to expect your brand’s narrative around value, service or pricing to be consistent across each and every touchpoint they encounter. This is no longer about being a visionary, this about basic blocking and tackling.

Another important change has been the increasing emphasis upon more accurately measuring the ROI of those marketing channels. If businesses have learned anything from their online initiatives, it is that a great many of them can be measured in a way that their offline activities cannot. Of course, the fact that an activity can be measured does not necessarily mean that it should be, at least in the way that we have done so to date. What flows out of this reality is that marketers must apply some manner of metric to everything that they do – online and offline. There is certainly nothing revolutionary about the idea of measuring and applying critical analysis of how resources are spent, but it begs the question of whether businesses are measuring the right things and if those metrics are valid. The beauty of the Google paid search machine is that you get a pretty clear picture of what happens when you put money in the slot, i.e., a click costs a dime, it takes 100 clicks to get an action so voila! the cost to acquire is ten bucks. This leads to ROI calculation that is clean, relatively accurate, and aligns neatly with the silo’d activities of ten years ago. Unless you are a pure-play (online or offline) and market in only one channel, this model can lead to inaccurate metrics at best, and poor decision making around resource allocation.

If only it was so simple to measure the investment in marketing collateral, tradeshow displays, online and offline display advertising, direct marketing efforts, customer retention and lifetime values, search marketing, broadcast, social media, and so on. Truly integrated and multi-disciplinary marketing requires more thoughtful measurement models. Relying upon “last click” attribution today makes no more sense than using a print publication’s circulation and pass-along rates did when the magazine and newspaper business was still healthy. The challenge remains to blend the various aspects of a comprehensive marketing mix and emerge with a more holistic view of what is spent and what that resulted in.

Steve Kerho of Organic reported some interesting findings in a recent post on developing an “analytics ecosystem” model for multi-modal campaigns across the web. Paid search, display (banner) ads and branded website activities showed some inter-relationships that confirm what many marketers have “known” but have had difficulty demonstrating. To wit, paid search performs better when a user sees display ads prior to clicking through a search ad; branded sites converted at much higher rates when display ads were viewed in prior sessions, but after too many display impressions performance fell off. Clearly, utilizing a last-click attribution model around your paid search campaigns risks undervaluing concurrent campaigns in different vehicles. The temptation to discard every activity but paid search requires the development of proxy metrics and blended or weighted analytics to more fully capture ROI. The long story short is that being able to model and manage the data will be a minimal requirement for marketing in the coming years. Marketers that can develop or partner with those that can aggregate and segment data will have the best chance of success going forward. Sound familiar?

, ,

No Comments

Customer Service Redux – Thule’s Response

A couple of weeks back I wrote of the high cost of retaining customers when your customer service doesn’t match-up with your marketing message. You can read the original post here – the quick review is that a relatively small but important part of a Thule bike rack had broken. Their customer service, while responsive, was of little help. The rack was returned to the retailer (REI) where it was refunded promptly. The net result was a loyal REI customer and a determination to purchase anything but a Thule product in the future.

Apparently, the folks at Thule monitor the web for blog posts and tweets that mention their brand. The day after the original post I received an email from Thule’s Director of North America Customer Service that read:

Dear Customer Service Reps,
Please take the time today to read the below Customer Service story.

http://mudslingonline.com/?p=475

This is the devastating repercussion of not going the extra mile with our consumers.
I cannot believe this poor consumer service comes from our department. I am shocked and disappointed.
This will be addressed in our upcoming meeting.

Over the course of the next few days I was contacted by Thule and they graciously shipped a new rack to my front door. That may fall into the category of “overcompensating”, but I appreciated both the company’s response and their subsequent follow-up. From the standpoint of customer service, it appears that Thule’s management will be stressing the importance of “going the extra mile”, i.e., to get the small details right the first time. Now to be fair, Thule’s customer service wasn’t unresponsive – the rep that handled the issue initially just let a logical resolution fall on the floor. What is probably a $10 part morphed into a $450 headache.

So a few lessons for those of us in the brand and product marketing spaces:

  • Customer retention requires consistent training and management support to ensure that the staff members directly engaged with customers are doing the right things and understand the importance of their roles. The best customer service is driven from the staff level up – when the rep knows the right thing to do and is expected and empowered to do it.
  • Leveraging online tools to monitor blogs and social networks can provide rapid and actionable insight into how your brand and products are being positioned – not by you but by your customers.
  • Competitive intelligence and opportunities can be captured via monitoring those same online tools. A competitor such as Yakima could have had an easy P.R. win by stepping in through Twitter.
  • Visible and direct acknowledgment of identified service issues – both internal to your organization and externally to customers – is a great way to help ensure that the marketing message, product benefit and brand positions stay aligned.

So kudos to Thule’s management for stepping in quickly and authoritatively. They chose to go that extra mile to win-back a customer. Now it’s time for a bike ride…

,

No Comments

A Tale of Two Customer Service Experiences

In these recessionary times companies would do well to remember that retaining their existing customers is a far less costly activity than attracting newbies. My experience has been that it is not unusual for new customer acquisition costs to run 4x (or more) the cost to hold onto what they’ve already paid for. Case in point is a recent experience with sports equipment rack manufacturer, Thule.

I had spent about $400 for a Thule bike rack a few years back – not an insignificant price for an accessory that did an awful job of enhancing the appearance of my vehicle, but a pretty good job of holding bikes. This thing weighed enough to induce a round of Advil shots every time I installed it into the hitch of the SUV. A good product with a lifetime warranty. Long story short, a fairly important part, i.e., the part that keeps the bikes from swinging wildly from side-to-side, failed during a recent roadtrip (more on that in upcoming posts).

Thule’s website provides a customer service link and a form post that allows you to submit questions and requests for help. I filled out the form and received an email back from a Customer Service Representative in about a day. So far, so good. The rep seemed a little fuzzy on which rack I had and what part had failed. Their CRM system required that any reply messages be written inside of some text brackets within the body of the email rather than allowing me to simply reply. I found this out after a couple of failed attempts to provide additional info.

Because your reply will be automatically processed, you MUST enter your reply
in the space below. Text entered into any other part of this message
will be discarded.

[===> Please enter your reply below this line <===]


[===> Please enter your reply above this line <===]


If your issue remains unresolved, please update this question at
http://thule.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/thule.cfg/php/enduser/acct_login.php?p_userid=xslkjlksdk.com&p_next_page=myq_upd.php&p_iid=87338&p_created=sdddfddddd” target=”_blank”>http://thule.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/thule.cfg/php/enduser/acct_login.php?p_userid=sdkjxlkekjkl.com&p_next_page=myq_upd.php&p_iid=873922&p_created=124932666

Note to businesses – don’t ask me to do things in a way that is completely inconsistent with what most customers expect. I know your CRM wants replies a certain way, but that’s good for you, not for me. Still no ability to figure out which model rack so I asked if sending a photo would help. The CSR went around the system and provided a direct email address where I could send pictures. That was good, but this is what came back…

…we don’t make it anymore.  We don’t have the knob you are requesting available

That was it.  No more emails, no additional advice on where to find the part – not so much as a discount coupon for a new rack. In other words, “see you later sucker!” I then went to REI where I had purchased the rack 4 years earlier thinking that they might have a spare part. Their CRM system was a human being that told me to bring the rack back to the store and they would issue a refund. She explained that their customer service policy is to guarantee unconditional satisfaction. Thule’s warranty is described as “lifetime*” – the asterisk apparently means that if they still make it or have an extra part laying around the warehouse, they’ll be happy to help. The REI service rep said that “Thule will have to deal with us on this” – I suspect that when what must be your largest retail customer drops a 4-year old broken bike rack in your lap your response is “Thank you.”

So what’s the end result? REI has me for life. The replacement rack will come from somebody other than Thule and I’m writing this as a way to spread the word that doing customer service right is the best economic solution. Perhaps Thule will regain me as a customer someday, but it’s going to cost them much more than before.

,

No Comments